Dangers of Stevia
From LoveToKnow Safety
A lot has been said about the dangers of stevia, a naturally sweet herb housed in the sunflower family. Here we separate fact from fiction and give you the low-down on this controversial extract.
Stevia: The Basics
Native to subtropical and tropical South America and Central American, stevia is an herb extract with about 300 times the sweetening power of sugar. Widely used throughout Japan as a sweetener, stevia is now available in the United States and Canada as a dietary supplement, but not as a food additive or sweetener.
Before we address some of the dangers of stevia, let’s take a look at its reported medical benefits. These benefits include:
- It can help in the treatment and management of obesity.
- Stevia has negligible affect on blood glucose and may even enhance the levels of a patient’s glucose tolerance.
- Can help alleviate high blood pressure.
These beneficial medical factors help make stevia an attractive alternative to sugar, and a natural sweetener for diabetics and others who may be on a carbohydrate-controlled diet.
The Dangers of Stevia
All of these medicinal benefits notwithstanding, scientific reports have shown that the extract stevia may also be harmful when consumed. Some of these medicinal problems include:
| Danger | Description |
| Reproductive Difficulties | Stevia, or the singular stevioside, at least in some studies, seems to affect the male reproductive organs. This was the conclusion of a group of European scientists in early 2006.
|
| Cancer | There have also, at least in preliminary studies, been links to cancer.
|
| Energy Metabolism | Studies indicate that large amounts of stevioside can interfere with the absorption of carbohydrates in animals and disrupt the conversion of food into energy within cells. Scientists are particularly worried about this development, especially as it pertains to children. |
Friend or Foe?
Despite all of the scientific evidence, both positive and negative, no clear agreements have been drawn about the dangers of stevia.
On the one hand, stevia has been in wide use in Japan for the past 30 years, and to date, no evidence of any adverse reactions have surfaced during this time.
On the other hand, however, the Food and Drug Administration continues to firmly maintain that stevia is an unsafe food additive. Because of this classification, the FDA restricts the import of stevia as a food additive. The FDA position on stevia maintains that the toxicological information on stevia is too inadequate to determine its safety for consumption by the general public.
Opponents of this ruling argue, however, that it is not scientific evidence, but big money that allows the FDA to maintain this ban. They further argue that because stevia is a naturally occurring product, and therefore one that requires no patent to produce, no one company can capitalize on its development. Anyone, lay person or not, can harvest this naturally sweet plant.
The Future
As for the future of Stevia, Coca Cola plans to market stevia under the trade name of Rebiana and is currently patent-pending. This calorie-free food and beverage sweetener is also being marketed under the Cargill corporation, a food and agricultural provider. Likewise, both these companies hope that Rebiana will gain FDA approval as a food additive, and be widely marketed in the United States by 2009.
Learn More
Comments
Unless you can link or tell us where to find these "studies", you have provided no way of substantiating your remarks. I don't mean to make it sound like a personal attack, but there is way too much misinformation on the internet. I don't personally know you or who you possibly represent, so how can I believe what you say without references to the information you are providing?
-- Contributed by: GooberJust about anything consumed in massive quantities can be unsafe. Also, one has to consider that the metabolism of rats is not the same as humans. I trust the years of consistent use by humans more than the FDA. That said, some people might be allergic to stevia or be taking something else that reacts badly with it. According to traditional South American herbal practitioners, it tends to balance the blood sugar very aggressively when taken more than a couple of days. It's given to diabetics who can't afford insulin and hypoglycemics who don't want to suffer the ill effects of eating too much white sugar because that leaches important vitamins and minerals. It works very fast, so if you are taking another sugar balancing herb, you should probably either stop that one or stop the stevia. Some thermogenic mixes for weight loss have blood sugar lowering herbs, so taking stevia would be like an overdose for some people. Just remember, it's a plant. By the way, I wouldn't take the denatured chemical. It lacks the bittersweet aftertaste that tells you when you've had enough. I have suspicions that humans don't really crave sugar as much as we're actually craving sweet herbs like stevia, onions, and other things that have sweet proteins or inulins, rather than simple carbohydrates. The non carbohydrate sweet plants are usually antimicrobial and/or antioxidant, and help fight infection fairly quickly...fast enough that a person could feel the effects and crave more.
-- Contributed by: Nicole LasherI think this article is very informative and shows both sides of the argument. As with anything moderation is the key..and Stevia still comes out on top over artificial sweeteners anyday..
-- Contributed by: grego
This page has been accessed 24,276 times. This page was last modified 03:47, 23 November 2009.
© 2006-2010 LoveToKnow Corp.
Subscribe with RSS
See all RSS feeds
Visit us on facebook